【經文資訊】大正新脩大藏經 第三十二冊 No. 1629《因明正理門論》
【版本記錄】CBETA 電子佛典 V1.8 (Big5) 普及版，完成日期：2006/04/12
【編輯說明】本資料庫由中華電子佛典協會（CBETA）依大正新脩大藏經所編輯
【原始資料】蕭鎮國大德提供，維習安大德提供之高麗藏 CD 經文，日本 SAT 組織提供，北美某大德提供
【其它事項】本資料庫可自由免費流通，詳細內容請參閱【中華電子佛典協會版權宣告】(http://www.cbeta.org/copyright.htm)
=========================================================================
# Taisho Tripitaka Vol. 32, No. 1629 因明正理門論
# CBETA Chinese Electronic Tripitaka V1.8 (Big5) Normalized Version, Release Date: 2006/04/12
# Distributor: Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association (CBETA)
# Source material obtained from: Text as provided by Mr. Hsiao Chen-Kuo, Tripitaka Koreana as provided by Mr. Christian Wittern, Text as provided by SAT, Japan, Text as provided by Anonymous, USA
# Distributed free of charge. For details please read at http://www.cbeta.org/copyright_e.htm
=========================================================================
T32n1629_p0006a08║
T32n1629_p0006a09║
T32n1629_p0006a10║　　No. 1629 [No. 1628]
T32n1629_p0006a11║因明正理門論一卷
T32n1629_p0006a12║
T32n1629_p0006a13║　　　　大域龍菩薩造
T32n1629_p0006a14║　　　　大唐三藏法師義淨奉　制譯
T32n1629_p0006a15║論曰。為欲簡持能立能破義中真實故造斯
T32n1629_p0006a16║論。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0006a17║　宗等多言說能立　　是中唯隨自意樂
T32n1629_p0006a18║　為所成立說名宗　　非彼相違義能遣
T32n1629_p0006a19║論曰。能立過義印真實義。此論今作宗等多
T32n1629_p0006a20║言說能立。如是等此言為顯由緒所詮所為。
T32n1629_p0006a21║言由緒者。為由利益諸有情等。為緣緒故。言
T32n1629_p0006a22║所詮者。謂所詮義即宗等也。所為事者。為欲
T32n1629_p0006a23║印定實義故也。若其為顯由緒等果。於此論
T32n1629_p0006a24║初置斯言者。由於餘處已顯此義故。猶如現
T32n1629_p0006a25║量。何謂餘顯解論後時由此於初不應說故。
T32n1629_p0006a26║若爾非論分故。猶若餘言由於餘處已顯此
T32n1629_p0006a27║義。此因不成。解論後時方曉義者。覺慧先聞
T32n1629_p0006a28║於由緒等。若不了知初便不轉。由斯解故方
T32n1629_p0006a29║契後時非論分故。此亦不成。設如斯意既非
T32n1629_p0006b01║經故復非其釋必非支分。誰釋此經誰經此
T32n1629_p0006b02║釋。是故當知。如天授語非其支分。諸論由緒
T32n1629_p0006b03║亦成分故。此因有故遠離非成。餘復難言勿
T32n1629_p0006b04║造斯論無由緒等故。如狂人言為顯此因不
T32n1629_p0006b05║成。答曰。所謂能立能過義等。若言如是勿造
T32n1629_p0006b06║斯論。述已顯義故。如第二理門惡叉波拖已
T32n1629_p0006b07║說宗等相。此因彼言顯不成故。豈非能立等
T32n1629_p0006b08║有印實義。然此論等不印實義故不成過。上
T32n1629_p0006b09║來已辯論主標宗。自下本文隨次當釋。宗等
T32n1629_p0006b10║多言說能立者。由宗因喻多言辯說。他未了
T32n1629_p0006b11║義為開示故。此之多言於論式等說名能立。
T32n1629_p0006b12║又以一言說能立者。為顯總成一能立性。由
T32n1629_p0006b13║此應知。隨有所闕名能立過。言是中者起論
T32n1629_p0006b14║端義或簡持義。是宗等中故名是中。所言唯
T32n1629_p0006b15║者。是簡別義。隨自意顯。不顧論宗隨自意立。
T32n1629_p0006b16║樂為所立。謂不樂為能成立性。若異此者。說
T32n1629_p0006b17║所成立。似因似喻應亦名宗。為顯離餘立宗
T32n1629_p0006b18║過失故。言非彼相違義能遣。若非違義言聲
T32n1629_p0006b19║所遣。如立一切言皆是妄。或先所立宗義相
T32n1629_p0006b20║違。如獯狐子立聲為常。又若於中由不共故
T32n1629_p0006b21║無有比量為極成言相違義遣。如說懷兔非
T32n1629_p0006b22║月有故。又於有法即彼所立為此極成現量
T32n1629_p0006b23║比量相違義遣。如有成立聲非所聞瓶是常
T32n1629_p0006b24║等。諸有說言。宗因相違名宗違者。此非宗
T32n1629_p0006b25║過。以於此中立聲為常。一切皆是無常故者。
T32n1629_p0006b26║是喻方便惡立異法由合喻顯非一切故。此
T32n1629_p0006b27║因非有。以聲攝在一切中故。或是所立一分
T32n1629_p0006b28║義故。此義不成。名因過失。喻亦有過。由異
T32n1629_p0006b29║法喻先顯宗無後說因無。應如是言無常一
T32n1629_p0006c01║切。是謂非非一切故義。然此倒說一切無常。
T32n1629_p0006c02║是故此中喻亦有過。如是已說宗及似宗因
T32n1629_p0006c03║與似因多是宗法。此差別相今當顯示。頌
T32n1629_p0006c04║曰。
T32n1629_p0006c05║　宗法於同品　　謂有非有俱
T32n1629_p0006c06║　於異品各三　　有非有及二
T32n1629_p0006c07║論曰。豈不總以樂所成立合說為宗。云何此
T32n1629_p0006c08║中乃言宗者唯取有法。此無有失。以其總聲
T32n1629_p0006c09║於別亦轉。如言燒衣。或有宗聲唯詮於法。此
T32n1629_p0006c10║中宗法。唯取立論及敵論者決定同許。於同
T32n1629_p0006c11║品中有非有等亦復如是。何以故。今此唯依
T32n1629_p0006c12║證了因故。但由智力了所說義。非如生因由
T32n1629_p0006c13║能起用。若爾既取智為了因。是言便失能成
T32n1629_p0006c14║立義。此亦不然。令彼憶念本極成故。是故此
T32n1629_p0006c15║中唯取彼此俱定許義。即為善說。由是若有
T32n1629_p0006c16║彼此不同許。定非宗法。如有成立聲是無常
T32n1629_p0006c17║眼所見故。又若敵論不同許者。如對顯論所
T32n1629_p0006c18║作性故。又若猶豫。如依煙等起疑惑時。成
T32n1629_p0006c19║立大種和合火有。以現煙故。或於是處有法
T32n1629_p0006c20║不成。如成立我其體周遍於一切處。生樂等
T32n1629_p0006c21║故。如是所說。一切品類所有言詞皆非能立。
T32n1629_p0006c22║於其同品有非有等。亦隨所應當如是說。於
T32n1629_p0006c23║當所說因與相違及不定中。唯有共許決定
T32n1629_p0006c24║言詞。說名能立。或名能破。非互不成。猶豫言
T32n1629_p0006c25║詞復待成故。夫立宗法。理應更以餘法為因
T32n1629_p0006c26║成立此法。若即成立有法為有。或立為無。如
T32n1629_p0006c27║有成立最勝為有。現見別物有總類故。或立
T32n1629_p0006c28║為無。不可得故。其義云何。此中但立別物定
T32n1629_p0006c29║有。一因為宗不立最勝。故無此失。若立為無。
T32n1629_p0007a01║亦假安立不可得法。是故亦無有有法過。若
T32n1629_p0007a02║以有法立餘有法。或立其法。如以煙立火。或
T32n1629_p0007a03║以火立觸。其義云何。今於此中非以成立火
T32n1629_p0007a04║觸為宗。但為成立此相應物。若不爾者。依煙
T32n1629_p0007a05║立火依火立觸。應成宗義一分為因。又於此
T32n1629_p0007a06║中非欲成立。火觸有性共知有故。又於此中
T32n1629_p0007a07║觀所成故。立法有法非德有德故無有過。重
T32n1629_p0007a08║說頌言。
T32n1629_p0007a09║　有法非成於有法　　及法此非成有法
T32n1629_p0007a10║　但由法故成其法　　如是成立於有法
T32n1629_p0007a11║論曰。若有成立聲非是常。業等應常故。常應
T32n1629_p0007a12║可得故如是云何名為宗法。此說彼過由因
T32n1629_p0007a13║宗門。以有所立說應言故。以先立常無形礙
T32n1629_p0007a14║故。後但立宗斥彼因過。若如是立聲是無常。
T32n1629_p0007a15║所作非常故。常非所作故。此復云何。是喻方
T32n1629_p0007a16║便同法異法如其次第宣說其因。宗定隨逐
T32n1629_p0007a17║及宗無處定無因故。以於此中由合顯示所
T32n1629_p0007a18║作性因。如是此聲定是所作。非非所作。此所
T32n1629_p0007a19║作性定是宗法。重說頌言。
T32n1629_p0007a20║　說因宗所隨　　宗無因不有
T32n1629_p0007a21║　依第五顯喻　　由合故知因
T32n1629_p0007a22║論曰。由此已釋反破方便以所作性於無常
T32n1629_p0007a23║見故。於常不見故。如是成立聲非是常。應非
T32n1629_p0007a24║作故。是故順成反破方便非別解因。如破數
T32n1629_p0007a25║論我已廣辯。故應且止廣諍傍論。
T32n1629_p0007a26║如是宗法三種差別謂同品。有非有及俱先
T32n1629_p0007a27║除及字此中若品與所立法鄰近均等說名同
T32n1629_p0007a28║品以一切義皆名品故若所立無說立異品。
T32n1629_p0007a29║非與同品相違。或異若相違者。應唯簡別。若
T32n1629_p0007b01║別異者應無有因。由此道理所作性故能成
T32n1629_p0007b02║無常及無我等不相違故。若法能成相違所
T32n1629_p0007b03║立。是相違過即名似因。如無違法相違亦爾。
T32n1629_p0007b04║所成法無定無有故。非如瓶等因成猶豫於
T32n1629_p0007b05║彼展轉無中有故。以所作性現見離瓶於衣
T32n1629_p0007b06║等有非離無常於無我等此因有故。云何別
T32n1629_p0007b07║法於別處轉。由彼相似不說異名言即是此
T32n1629_p0007b08║故無有失。若不說異云何此因說名宗法。此
T32n1629_p0007b09║中但說定是宗法。不欲說言唯是宗法。若爾
T32n1629_p0007b10║同品應亦名宗。不然別處說所成故因必無
T32n1629_p0007b11║異方成比量故不相似。又此一一各有三種。
T32n1629_p0007b12║謂於一切同品有中。於其異品或有非有及有
T32n1629_p0007b13║非有。於其同品非有及俱。各有如是三種差
T32n1629_p0007b14║別。若無常宗全無異品對不立有虛空等論。
T32n1629_p0007b15║云何得說彼處此無。若彼無有於彼不轉全
T32n1629_p0007b16║無有疑故無此過。如是合成九種宗法。隨其
T32n1629_p0007b17║次第略辯其相。謂立聲常所量性故。或立無
T32n1629_p0007b18║常所作性故。或立勤勇無間所發無常性故。
T32n1629_p0007b19║或立為常所作性故。或立為常所聞性故。或
T32n1629_p0007b20║立為常勤勇無間所發性故。或非勤勇無間
T32n1629_p0007b21║所發無常性故。或立無常勤勇無間所發性
T32n1629_p0007b22║故。或立為常無觸對故。如是九種二頌所攝。
T32n1629_p0007b23║頌曰。
T32n1629_p0007b24║　常無常勤勇　　恒住堅牢性
T32n1629_p0007b25║　非勤遷不變　　由所量等九
T32n1629_p0007b26║　所量作無常　　作性聞勇發
T32n1629_p0007b27║　無常勇無觸　　依常性等九
T32n1629_p0007b28║論曰。如是分別。說名為因。相違不定。故本頌
T32n1629_p0007b29║言。
T32n1629_p0007c01║　於同有及二　　在異無是因
T32n1629_p0007c02║　翻此名相違　　所餘皆不定
T32n1629_p0007c03║此中唯有二種名因。謂於同品一切遍有異
T32n1629_p0007c04║品遍無。及於同品通有非有。異品遍無。於初
T32n1629_p0007c05║後三各取中一。復唯二種說名相違。能倒立
T32n1629_p0007c06║故。謂於異品有及二種。於其同品一切遍無。
T32n1629_p0007c07║第二三中取初後二。所餘五種因及相違皆
T32n1629_p0007c08║不決定。是疑因義。又於一切因等相中。皆說
T32n1629_p0007c09║所說一數同類勿說二相。更互相違共集一
T32n1629_p0007c10║處猶為因等。或於一相同作事故成不遍因。
T32n1629_p0007c11║理應四種。名不定因二俱有故。所聞云何由
T32n1629_p0007c12║不共故。以若不共所成立法。所有差別遍攝
T32n1629_p0007c13║一切。皆是疑因。唯彼有性彼所攝故。一向離
T32n1629_p0007c14║故。諸有皆共無簡別因。此唯於彼俱不相違
T32n1629_p0007c15║是疑因性。若於其中俱分是有亦是定因。簡
T32n1629_p0007c16║別餘故。是名差別。若對許有聲性是常此應
T32n1629_p0007c17║成因。若於爾時無有顯示。所作性等是無常
T32n1629_p0007c18║因。容有此義。然俱可得一義相違不容有故
T32n1629_p0007c19║是猶豫因。又於此中現教力勝故。應依此思
T32n1629_p0007c20║求決定攝上。頌言。
T32n1629_p0007c21║　若法是不共　　共決定相違
T32n1629_p0007c22║　遍一切於彼　　皆是疑因性
T32n1629_p0007c23║　邪證法有法　　自性或差別
T32n1629_p0007c24║　此成相違因　　若無所違害
T32n1629_p0007c25║　觀宗法審察　　若所樂違害
T32n1629_p0007c26║　成躊躇顛倒　　異此無似因
T32n1629_p0007c27║諭曰。如是已辯因及似因。喻及似喻我今
T32n1629_p0007c28║當說。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0007c29║　說因宗所隨　　宗無因不有
T32n1629_p0008a01║　此二名譬喻　　餘皆此相似
T32n1629_p0008a02║論曰。喻有二種。同法異法。同法者。謂立聲無
T32n1629_p0008a03║常勤勇無間所發性故。以諸勤勇無間所發
T32n1629_p0008a04║皆見無常猶如瓶等。異法者。謂諸有常住見。
T32n1629_p0008a05║非勤勇無間所發。如虛空等。前是遮詮後唯
T32n1629_p0008a06║止濫。由合及離比度義故。由是雖對不立實
T32n1629_p0008a07║有。太虛空等而得顯示。無有宗處無因義成。
T32n1629_p0008a08║復以何緣第一說因宗所隨逐。第二說宗無
T32n1629_p0008a09║因不有。不說因無宗不有耶。由如是說。能顯
T32n1629_p0008a10║示因同品定有異品遍無非顛倒說。又說頌
T32n1629_p0008a11║言。
T32n1629_p0008a12║　應以非作證其常　　或以無常成所作
T32n1629_p0008a13║　若爾應成非所說　　不遍非樂等合離
T32n1629_p0008a14║論曰。如是已說。二法合離順反兩喻。餘此相
T32n1629_p0008a15║似是似喻義。何謂此餘。謂於是處所立能立
T32n1629_p0008a16║及不同品雖有合離而顛倒說。或於是處不作
T32n1629_p0008a17║合離。唯現所立能立俱有異品俱無。如是二
T32n1629_p0008a18║法。或有隨一不成不遣。或有二俱不成不遣。
T32n1629_p0008a19║如立聲常無觸對故。同法喻言。諸無觸對見
T32n1629_p0008a20║彼皆常。如業如極微如瓶等。異法喻言。謂諸
T32n1629_p0008a21║無常見有觸對。如極微如業如虛空等。由此
T32n1629_p0008a22║已說同法喻中有法不成。謂對不許常虛空
T32n1629_p0008a23║等為要具二。譬喻言詞方成能立。為如其因
T32n1629_p0008a24║但隨說一。若就正理應具說二。由是具足顯
T32n1629_p0008a25║示所立不離其因。以具顯示同品定有異品
T32n1629_p0008a26║遍無。能正對治相違不定。若有於此一分已
T32n1629_p0008a27║成。隨說一分亦成能立。若如其聲兩義同許
T32n1629_p0008a28║俱不須說。或由義准一能顯二。又比量中
T32n1629_p0008a29║唯見此理。若所比處此相審定。於餘同類念
T32n1629_p0008b01║此定有。於彼無處念此遍無。是故由此生決
T32n1629_p0008b02║定解。故本頌言。
T32n1629_p0008b03║　如自決定已　　悕他決定生
T32n1629_p0008b04║　說宗法相應　　所立餘遠離
T32n1629_p0008b05║論曰。為於所比顯宗法性故說因言。為顯於
T32n1629_p0008b06║此不相離性故說喻言。為顯所比故說宗言。
T32n1629_p0008b07║於所比中除此更無其餘支分。由是遮遣餘
T32n1629_p0008b08║審察等及與合結。若爾喻言應非異分。顯因
T32n1629_p0008b09║義故。事雖實爾。然此因言唯為顯了是宗法
T32n1629_p0008b10║性。非為顯了同品異品有性無性。故須別說
T32n1629_p0008b11║同異喻言。若唯因言所詮表義說名為因。斯
T32n1629_p0008b12║有何失。復有何得。別說喻分是名為得。應如
T32n1629_p0008b13║世間所說方便。與其因義都不相應。若爾何
T32n1629_p0008b14║失。此說但應類所立義無有功能非能立義。
T32n1629_p0008b15║由彼但說所作性故。所類同法不說能立所
T32n1629_p0008b16║成立義。又因喻別此有所立。同法異法終不
T32n1629_p0008b17║能顯。因與所立不相離性。是故但有類所立
T32n1629_p0008b18║義然無功能。何故無能。以同喻中不必宗法
T32n1629_p0008b19║宗義相類。此復餘譬所成立故。應成無窮。又
T32n1629_p0008b20║不必定有諸品類。非異品中不顯無性。有所
T32n1629_p0008b21║簡別能為譬喻。故說頌言。
T32n1629_p0008b22║　若因唯所立　　或差別相類
T32n1629_p0008b23║　譬喻應無窮　　及遮遣異品
T32n1629_p0008b24║論曰。世間但顯宗因異品。同處有性為異法
T32n1629_p0008b25║喻。非宗無處因不有性故定無能。若唯宗法
T32n1629_p0008b26║是因性者。其有不定應亦成因。云何具有所
T32n1629_p0008b27║立能立及異品法二種譬喻而有此失。若於
T32n1629_p0008b28║爾時所立異品非一種類便有此失。如初後
T32n1629_p0008b29║三各最後喻故定三相唯為顯因。由是道理
T32n1629_p0008c01║雖一切分皆能為因顯了所立。然唯一分且
T32n1629_p0008c02║說為因。如是略說宗等及似。即此多言說名
T32n1629_p0008c03║能立及似能立。隨其所應為開悟他。說此能
T32n1629_p0008c04║立及似能立。為自開悟唯有現量及與比量。
T32n1629_p0008c05║彼聲喻等攝在此中故唯二量由此能了自共
T32n1629_p0008c06║相故。非離此二別有所量為了知彼更立餘
T32n1629_p0008c07║量。故本頌言。
T32n1629_p0008c08║　現量除分別　　餘所說因生
T32n1629_p0008c09║論曰。此中現量除分別者。謂若有智於色等
T32n1629_p0008c10║境。遠離一切種類名言。假立無異諸門分別。
T32n1629_p0008c11║由不共緣現現別轉故名現量。故說頌言。
T32n1629_p0008c12║　有法非一相　　根非一切行
T32n1629_p0008c13║　唯內證離言　　是色根境界
T32n1629_p0008c14║論曰。意地亦有離諸分別唯證行轉。又於貪
T32n1629_p0008c15║等諸自證分。諸修定者離教分別。皆是現量。
T32n1629_p0008c16║又於此中無別量果。以即此體似義生故。似
T32n1629_p0008c17║有用故。假說為量。若於貪等諸自證分亦是
T32n1629_p0008c18║現量。何故此中除分別智。不遮此中自證現
T32n1629_p0008c19║量。無分別故。但於此中了餘境分不名現量。
T32n1629_p0008c20║由此即說憶念比度悕求疑智惑亂智等。於
T32n1629_p0008c21║鹿愛等皆非現量。隨先所受分別轉故。如是
T32n1629_p0008c22║一切世俗有中瓶等數等舉等有性瓶性等
T32n1629_p0008c23║智。皆似現量。於實有中作餘行相。假合餘義
T32n1629_p0008c24║分別轉故。
T32n1629_p0008c25║已說現量。當說比量。餘所說因生者。謂智是
T32n1629_p0008c26║前智。餘從如所說能立因生。是緣彼義。此有
T32n1629_p0008c27║二種。謂於所比審觀察智。從現量生或比量
T32n1629_p0008c28║生。及憶此因與所立宗不相離念。由是成前
T32n1629_p0008c29║舉所說力念因同品定有等故。是近及遠比
T32n1629_p0009a01║度因故俱名比量。此依作具作者而說。如是
T32n1629_p0009a02║應知。悟他比量亦不離此得成能立。故說頌
T32n1629_p0009a03║言。
T32n1629_p0009a04║　一事有多法　　相非一切行
T32n1629_p0009a05║　唯由簡別餘　　表定能隨逐
T32n1629_p0009a06║　如是能相者　　亦有眾多法
T32n1629_p0009a07║　唯不越所相　　能表示非餘
T32n1629_p0009a08║論曰。何故此中與前現量。別異建立為現二
T32n1629_p0009a09║門。此處亦應於其比果說為比量。彼處亦應
T32n1629_p0009a10║於其現因說為現量。俱不遮止。已說能立及
T32n1629_p0009a11║似能立。當說能破及似能破。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0009a12║　能破闕等言　　似破謂諸類
T32n1629_p0009a13║論曰。此中能破闕等言者。謂前所說闕等言
T32n1629_p0009a14║詞諸分過失。彼一一言皆名能破。由彼一一
T32n1629_p0009a15║能顯前宗非善說故。所言似破謂諸類者。諸
T32n1629_p0009a16║同法等相似過類名似能破。由彼多分於善
T32n1629_p0009a17║比量。為迷惑他而施設故。不能顯示前宗不
T32n1629_p0009a18║善。由彼非理而破斥故。及能破處而施設
T32n1629_p0009a19║故。是彼類故說名過類。若於非理立比量中
T32n1629_p0009a20║如是施設。或不了知比量過失。或即為顯彼
T32n1629_p0009a21║過失門。不名過類。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0009a22║　示現異品故　　由同法異立
T32n1629_p0009a23║　同法相似餘　　由異法分別
T32n1629_p0009a24║　差別名分別　　應一成無異
T32n1629_p0009a25║　顯所立餘因　　名可得相似
T32n1629_p0009a26║　難義別疑因　　故說名猶豫
T32n1629_p0009a27║　說異品義故　　非愛名義准
T32n1629_p0009a28║論曰。此中示現異品故由同法異立同法相
T32n1629_p0009a29║似者。顛倒成立故名異立。此依作具作者而
T32n1629_p0009b01║說。同法即是相似故名同法相似。一切攝立
T32n1629_p0009b02║中相似過類故。言相似者是不男聲。能破相
T32n1629_p0009b03║應故。或隨結頌故。云何同法相似。能破於所
T32n1629_p0009b04║作中說能作故。傳生起故。作如是說。後隨所
T32n1629_p0009b05║應亦如是說。今於此中由同法喻顛倒成立。
T32n1629_p0009b06║是故說名同法相似。如有成立聲是無常勤
T32n1629_p0009b07║勇無間所發性故。此以虛空為異法喻。有顯
T32n1629_p0009b08║虛空為同法喻。無質等故立聲為常。如是即
T32n1629_p0009b09║此所說因中瓶應為同法。而異品虛空說為
T32n1629_p0009b10║同法。由是說為同法相似。餘由異法者。謂異
T32n1629_p0009b11║法相似。是前同法相似之餘。示現異品由異
T32n1629_p0009b12║法喻顛倒而立。二種喻中如前安立瓶為異
T32n1629_p0009b13║法。是故說為異法相似。分別差別名分別者。
T32n1629_p0009b14║前說示現等故。今說分別差別故。應知分別
T32n1629_p0009b15║同法差別。謂如前說瓶為同法。於彼同法有
T32n1629_p0009b16║可燒等差別義故。是則瓶應無常非聲。聲應
T32n1629_p0009b17║是常不可燒等有差別故。由此分別顛倒所
T32n1629_p0009b18║立。是故說名分別相似所言應一成無異者。
T32n1629_p0009b19║示現同法前已說故。由此與彼應成一故。彼
T32n1629_p0009b20║者是誰。以更不聞異方便故。相鄰近故。應知
T32n1629_p0009b21║是宗成無異者成無異過。即由此言義可知
T32n1629_p0009b22║故不說其名。是誰與誰共成無異不別說故。
T32n1629_p0009b23║即此一切與彼一切。如有說言。若見瓶等有
T32n1629_p0009b24║同法故。即合餘法亦無別異。一切瓶法聲應
T32n1629_p0009b25║皆有。是則一切更互法同應成一性。彼中抑
T32n1629_p0009b26║成無別異過。亦為顯示瓶聲差別。不甚異前
T32n1629_p0009b27║分別相似故應別說。若以勤勇無間所發成
T32n1629_p0009b28║立無常。欲顯俱是非畢竟性。則成宗因無別
T32n1629_p0009b29║異過。抑此令成無別異性。是故說名無異。相
T32n1629_p0009c01║似有說此因如能成立。所成立法亦能成立。
T32n1629_p0009c02║此相違法由無別異。是故說名無異相似。顯
T32n1629_p0009c03║所立餘因名可得相似者。謂若顯示所立宗
T32n1629_p0009c04║法餘因可得。是則說名可得相似。謂有說言。
T32n1629_p0009c05║如前成立聲是無常。此非正因。於電光等由
T32n1629_p0009c06║現見等餘因可得無常成故。以若離此而得
T32n1629_p0009c07║有彼此非彼因。有餘於此別作方便。謂此非
T32n1629_p0009c08║彼無常正因由不遍故。如說叢林。皆有思慮
T32n1629_p0009c09║有睡眠故。難義別疑因故說名猶豫者。過類
T32n1629_p0009c10║相應故女聲說。此中分別宗義別異因成不
T32n1629_p0009c11║定。是故說名猶豫相似。或復分別因義別異
T32n1629_p0009c12║故。名猶豫相似過類。謂有說言。如前成立
T32n1629_p0009c13║聲是無常。勤勇無間所發性故。現見勤勇無
T32n1629_p0009c14║間所發。或顯或生故成猶豫。今所成立為顯
T32n1629_p0009c15║為生。是故不應以如是因證無常義。說異品
T32n1629_p0009c16║義故非愛名義准者。謂有說言。若以勤勇無
T32n1629_p0009c17║間所發說無常者。義准則應若非勤勇無間
T32n1629_p0009c18║所發。諸電光等皆應是常。如是名為義准相
T32n1629_p0009c19║似。應知此中略去後句是故但名猶豫義准。
T32n1629_p0009c20║復由何義。此同法等相似過類。異因明師所
T32n1629_p0009c21║說次第。似破同故。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0009c22║　由此同法等　　多疑故似彼
T32n1629_p0009c23║論曰。多言為顯或有異難。及為顯似不成因
T32n1629_p0009c24║過。此中前四與我所說譬喻方便都不相應。
T32n1629_p0009c25║且隨世間譬喻方便。雖不顯因是決定性。然
T32n1629_p0009c26║攝其體故作是說。由用不定同法等因。成立
T32n1629_p0009c27║自宗方便說他。亦有此法。由是便成似共不
T32n1629_p0009c28║定。或復成似相違決定。若言唯為成立自宗。
T32n1629_p0009c29║云何不定得名能破。非即說此以為能破。難
T32n1629_p0010a01║不定言說名不定。於能詮中說所詮故。無有
T32n1629_p0010a02║此過。餘處亦應如是安立。若所立量有不定
T32n1629_p0010a03║過。或復決定同法等因有所成立。即名能破。
T32n1629_p0010a04║是等難故。若現見力比量不能遮遣其性。如
T32n1629_p0010a05║有成立聲非所聞猶如瓶等。以現見聲是所
T32n1629_p0010a06║聞故。不應以其是所聞性遮遣無常。非唯不
T32n1629_p0010a07║見能遮遣故若不爾者亦應遣常。第二無異
T32n1629_p0010a08║相似。是似不成因過。彼以本無而生增益所
T32n1629_p0010a09║立。為作宗因成一過故。此以本無而生極成
T32n1629_p0010a10║因法證滅後無。若即立彼可成能破。第三無
T32n1629_p0010a11║異相似。成立違害所立難故。成似由可燒等
T32n1629_p0010a12║不決定故。若是決定可成相違可得相似。所
T32n1629_p0010a13║立不定故成其似。若所立因於常亦有可成
T32n1629_p0010a14║能破第二可得。雖是不遍餘類無故似不成
T32n1629_p0010a15║過。若所立無可名能破。非於此中欲立一切
T32n1629_p0010a16║皆是無常。猶豫相似。謂以勤勇無間所發。得
T32n1629_p0010a17║成立滅壞。若以生起增益所立。作不定過。此
T32n1629_p0010a18║似不定。若於所立不起分別。但簡別因生起
T32n1629_p0010a19║為難。此似不成。由於此中不欲唯生。成立滅
T32n1629_p0010a20║壞。若生若顯悉皆滅壞。非不定故。義准相似。
T32n1629_p0010a21║謂以顛倒不定為難故似不定。若非勤勇無
T32n1629_p0010a22║間所發立常無常。或唯勤勇無間所發無常。
T32n1629_p0010a23║非餘可成能破。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0010a24║　若因至不至　　三時非愛言
T32n1629_p0010a25║　至非至無因　　是名似因闕
T32n1629_p0010a26║論曰。若因至不至三時非愛言至非至無因
T32n1629_p0010a27║者。於至不至作非愛言。若能立因至所立宗
T32n1629_p0010a28║而成立者。無差別故應非所立。如池海水相
T32n1629_p0010a29║合無異。又若不成應非相至。所立若成此是
T32n1629_p0010b01║誰因。若能立因不至所立不至非因。無差別
T32n1629_p0010b02║故應不成因。是名為至非至相似。又於三時
T32n1629_p0010b03║作非愛言。若能立因在所立前未有所立。此
T32n1629_p0010b04║是誰因。若言在後。所立已成復何須因。若俱
T32n1629_p0010b05║時者。因與有因皆不成就。如牛兩角。如是名
T32n1629_p0010b06║為無因相似。此中如前次第異者。由俱說名
T32n1629_p0010b07║似因闕故。所以者何。非理誹撥一切因故。此
T32n1629_p0010b08║中何理唯不至同。故雖因相相應亦不名因。
T32n1629_p0010b09║如是何理唯在所立前不得因名故即非能
T32n1629_p0010b10║立。又於此中有自害過。遮遣同故。如是且於
T32n1629_p0010b11║言因及慧所成立中有似因闕。於義因中有
T32n1629_p0010b12║似不成。非理誹撥諸法因故。如前二因。於義
T32n1629_p0010b13║所立俱非所作。能作性故。不應正理。若以正
T32n1629_p0010b14║理而誹撥時。可名能破。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0010b15║　說前無因故　　應無有所立
T32n1629_p0010b16║　名無說相似　　生無生亦然
T32n1629_p0010b17║　所作異少分　　顯所立不成
T32n1629_p0010b18║　名所作相似　　多如似宗說
T32n1629_p0010b19║論曰。說前因無故應無有所立名無說相似
T32n1629_p0010b20║者。謂有說言。如前所立若由此因證無常性
T32n1629_p0010b21║此未說前都無所有。因無有故。應非無常。如
T32n1629_p0010b22║是名為無說相似。生無生亦然者。生前無因
T32n1629_p0010b23║故無所立。亦即說名無生相似。言亦然者。類
T32n1629_p0010b24║例聲前因無有故應無所立。今於此中如無
T32n1629_p0010b25║所立。應知亦有所立相違。謂有說言。如前所
T32n1629_p0010b26║立若如是聲未生已前。無有勤勇無間所發。
T32n1629_p0010b27║應非無常。又非勤勇無間所發故應是常。如
T32n1629_p0010b28║是名為無生相似。所作異少分顯所立不成
T32n1629_p0010b29║名所作相似者。謂所成立所作性故猶如瓶
T32n1629_p0010c01║等。聲無常者若瓶有異所作性故可是無常
T32n1629_p0010c02║何豫聲事。如是名為所作相似。多如似宗說
T32n1629_p0010c03║者。如是無說相似等多分如似所立說。謂如
T32n1629_p0010c04║不成因過多言為顯。或如似餘。今於此中無
T32n1629_p0010c05║說相似增益比量。謂於論者所說言詞立無
T32n1629_p0010c06║常性。難未說前因無有故。此似不成。或似因
T32n1629_p0010c07║闕。謂未說前益能立故。若於此中顯義無有。
T32n1629_p0010c08║又立量時若無言說可成能破。無生相似。聲
T32n1629_p0010c09║未生前。增益所立難因無故。即名似破。若
T32n1629_p0010c10║成立時顯此是無可成能破。若未生前以非
T32n1629_p0010c11║勤勇無間所發。難令是常義准分故。亦似不
T32n1629_p0010c12║定所作相似乃有三種。若難瓶等所作性於
T32n1629_p0010c13║聲上無。此似不成。若難聲所作性於瓶等無。
T32n1629_p0010c14║此似相違。若難即此常上亦無是不共故。便
T32n1629_p0010c15║似不定。或似喻過引同法故。何以故。唯取總
T32n1629_p0010c16║法建立比量。不取別故。若取別義決定異故。
T32n1629_p0010c17║比量應無。頌曰。
T32n1629_p0010c18║　俱許而求因　　名生過相似
T32n1629_p0010c19║　此於喻設難　　名如似喻說
T32n1629_p0010c20║論曰。俱許而求因名生過相似者。謂有難言。
T32n1629_p0010c21║如前所立瓶等無常。復何因證。此於喻設難
T32n1629_p0010c22║名如似喻說者。謂瓶等無常俱許成就。而言
T32n1629_p0010c23║不成似喻難故。如似喻說頌曰。
T32n1629_p0010c24║　無常性恒隨　　名常住相似
T32n1629_p0010c25║　此成常性過　　名如宗過說
T32n1629_p0010c26║論曰。謂有難言。如前所立聲是無常。此應常
T32n1629_p0010c27║與無常性合。諸法自性恒不捨故。亦應是常。
T32n1629_p0010c28║此即名為常住相似。是似宗過。增益所立無
T32n1629_p0010c29║常住故。以於此中都無有別。實無常性依此
T32n1629_p0011a01║常轉。即此自性本無今有暫有還無。故名無
T32n1629_p0011a02║常。即此分位由自性緣名無常性。如果性等
T32n1629_p0011a03║如是過類足目所說多分說為似能破。性最
T32n1629_p0011a04║極成故。餘論所說亦應如是分別成立。即此
T32n1629_p0011a05║過類但由少分方便異故。建立無邊差別過
T32n1629_p0011a06║類。是故不說。如即此中諸有所說。增益損減
T32n1629_p0011a07║有顯無顯。生理別喻品類相似等。由此方隅
T32n1629_p0011a08║皆應諦察。及應遮遣諸有不善。比量方便作
T32n1629_p0011a09║如是說展轉流漫。此於餘論所說無窮故不
T32n1629_p0011a10║更說。又於負處。舊因明師諸有所說。或有墮
T32n1629_p0011a11║在能破中攝。或有極麤。或有非理。如詭語類
T32n1629_p0011a12║故此不錄。餘師宗等所有句義。亦應如是分
T32n1629_p0011a13║別建立。如是遍計所執分等皆不應理。違所
T32n1629_p0011a14║說相皆名無智。理極遠故。又復此類過失言
T32n1629_p0011a15║詞。我自朋屬論式等中多已制伏。又此方隅。
T32n1629_p0011a16║我於破古因明論中已具分別。故應且止頌
T32n1629_p0011a17║曰。
T32n1629_p0011a18║　為開智人慧毒藥　　啟斯妙義正理門
T32n1629_p0011a19║　諸有外量所迷者　　令越邪途契真義
T32n1629_p0011a20║因明正理門論一卷